Should Ellison keep the ball?

[ItalianStallion]

Well, the guy that caught Barry Bonds's 661st home run who dove out of his kayak in the bay to get it says that now he's going to keep it. Barry said that 660 was the one he really cared about, but should Ellison keep the ball anyways?

I say yes, just because I don't like Barry Bonds.

[rams fan]

i say yes also

[cashpath]

No Sell it.. baseballs are like $2 a piece and if you can get more than that for one then you should be selling it...

[ItalianStallion]

Hahaha. But, he's just a true baseball fan, like you and football. It's like if Priest Holmes was in Dallas and approaching the career touchdown record and spiked the ball as he passed the third place person on the list and it went into the stands and you caught it. Would you sell it?

[cashpath]

No, I'de give it to you...

I'm a cowboys fan... Not a "football" fan.. well not to that extent.. I mean I'm a football fan, but I would only keep souverneirs from Cowboys..

Now lets say Roy Williams intercepts a pass and runs it back for a touchdown then he hands me the ball... It would be in a safe in my house underground and only I would have the password

I was basically just re-expressing my feelings towards baseball thats all

[broncos1170]

I would sell the ball... make himself as rich as the real Larry Ellison (same name) CEO of Oracle...

[cashpath]

The ball would not sell for much.. It's not like its the real record breaker..

[ItalianStallion]

No, but it was very significant because it was Willie Mays, a legend, and Barry's godfather. Also, ESPN was making a huge deal about it.

[broncos1170]

Mark McGwire's 70th home run sold for something like 1,000,000 bucks+ so why wouldn't #661 sell for much?

[ItalianStallion]

Because #661 wasn't a record breaker, McGwire's 70th was the final home run that set the record. But, I still think Ellison could get a lot of money for the ball, not a million, but he'd get a lot.

[cashpath]

$5,000 - $10,000 if he's lucky...